I Teach

This blog is a place for me to debrief myself after my classes. It will serve both as a place for venting and as an archive for what worked and didn't work for me. I welcome outsider comments about teaching techniques or anything else.

Saturday, September 16, 2006

 

A Note About Grading

I'm a hard grader, but maybe not in the ways that people would expect (Jess). I've had to let go of the English major inside of me and give up on getting any sort of style from my student's writings. Most of them are first years and more importantly most of them are taking their first sociology class. The concepts are difficult enough for the majority of them to get a handle on (not because the concepts are particularly difficult, but just because they're unfamiliar from the way life is experienced in every other way for most people). Thus, for this first writing response (due on Monday) I'm keeping the training wheels on. We talked about what a thesis sentence is in class the other day. I told them that the point of the conversation was not to teach them how to write a thesis sentence, but rather to let them know that if they weren't already familiar with what one is, then they need to go to the writing center and find out. The English major in me died a little bit that day. I would love to teach these kids how to write, but the time and effort it would take would distract from the task at hand, and in any case, there are professionals in the next building who are much better at it than I. So I told them that at least for this first assignment/opportunity they had to underline what they think their thesis sentence is (I know, they're only one poorly written essay away from diagramming subjects and conjugates). And I understand that what I get in terms of argument is often at the expense of style. Often students will tell me "Well, you know what I meant here." Whether I do or not is not the point. These essays are about telling me what you meant in a way which supports your overall argument. So I make it clear to my students that if the best way for them to do that is to write two pages of 7 word, monosyllabic sentences, then so be it. I'll take caveman writing if it means that I'll get Platonian logic. Eventually I know, as well as you dear reader, that the two will have to come together if they want their writing to advance, but there are 400 level English classes titled "Re-claiming the Center through Postmodern Body-Texts of Dickinson, Borges, and O'Conner" or something like that where they will need those skills. For now, I just want them to get really good at explaining why they hold a particular position about the U.S. school system.

4 comments
Comments:
Two things:
A) I really wanted to comment because I'm mentioned in the first sentence of this blog.
and
2) As a teacher, I'm curious to know what they are writing about--"the US School System."
 
I'll let you know on Monday when I get their papers.
 
Perhaps not everyone wants or is going to debate or defend the principles presented in the class. As their teacher the point of the class first should be "did the students get what I was teaching". If that comes through in their essay's great, next is to see if they have a passion for the principles like you do but remember most are not sociologists and they are freshmen. Make the english/grammer part a positive by awarding extra points rather than a distractor.
 
I find, and perhaps anonymous does as well, that poor writing and poor thinking go hand-in-hand. I think you can lead with either and the other will follow.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

Archives

September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?